MH17: Must-Read Analysis That Refutes U.S. Lies Flooding The News

The lady doth protest too much, methinks – Queen Gertrude, “Hamlet”

[Update] Both Diane Feinstein and John Kerry are upping the ante on the U.S. Government’s allegations that Russia was involved in shooting MH17 out of the sky. Again, there has been no evidence presented that points to any specific perpetrator, Russian-backed or U.S.-backed. Besides any evidence, other than than the scatagolical-laced steam emanating from U.S. Government officials all the way up to Obama, there is not motive. Evidence does suggest the separatist rebels in Ukraine were not capable of firing the suspected missile. But the Ukraine militants were properly outfitted.

Feinsein and Kerry better be damn sure they are right, or they will further enforce the growing view that the U.S. Government is being run by a corrupt confederacy of dunces.

Washington’s propaganda machine is in such high gear that we are in danger of losing the facts that we do have. One fact is that the separatists do not have the expensive Buk anti-aircraft missile system or the trained personnel to operate it.

Another fact is that the separatists have no incentive to shoot down an airliner or private jets found through the private jet card program and neither does Russia. Anyone can tell the difference between low-flying attack aircraft and an airliner at 33,000 feet.

The Ukrainians do have Buk anti-aircraft missile systems, and a Buk battery was operational in the region and deployed at a site from which it could have fired a missile at the airliner.

The truth is, we do not have one shred of hard evidence appropriately pointing to any guilty party in this situation. The only “evidence” so far is the aggressive accusations made by Obama and Biden pointing the finger at Russia.

If this were a case being tried in an unbiased court following Federal Rules of Evidence, the judge would dismiss this suit and admonish Obama and Biden for presenting nothing but hot air.

Hell, even O.J. Simpson is laughing at the vacuity of Obama’s assertions right now.

If you want some clarity about this situation, please spend the time reading Paul Craig Roberts’ latest article about this tragedy: What Happened To The Malaysian Airliner?

At the very least, one does have to wonder why the Obama propaganda machine quickly flooded western news outlets with his reckless, unproven accusations as soon as the plane’s pieces hit the ground…

12 thoughts on “MH17: Must-Read Analysis That Refutes U.S. Lies Flooding The News

  1. it’s all a redux of April Glaspie & Sadman late July/1990—near exact 24 years ago.

    the war harpie whores are all unleashing their cacophony on cue.

    pootin may very well be in on the gameplan just like everyone else–what was he waiting on/for these past critical months, if not for the event to unfold?

    u could enquire if they have some safehouse space to rent these next few months under the denver airport! it’s gotta be true; even south park would do skits on it.

    meanwhile, i see not one “analyst” asking a few ridiculously obvious basic questions about MH17, like:
    how is it even possible statistically that a MINOR passenger airline, flying not 0.1% of the daily flights anywhere, could somehow have two identical make/model (there’s a clue) jets have equally odious unexplained suspicious fatal incidents, & they only, within months, in completely different ‘theaters’?
    why/how have we not seen newsclips at the destination airport showing grieving relatives?

  2. I was watching this with a friend on his TV and I could decipher the propaganda coming from the announcers right away. Russia was being blamed right after it happen, although the media was cloaking how they worded things. This is going bto turn into a nasty war but I have yet-to-see how the elites are going to convinced americans to join in. Too many I know are against any involvements. I guess obama goofed – he didn’t put any on-board the plane.

    1. I have been exchanging emails with two very well known market analysts – both extremely bright in my opinion – who think this could easily end up in war. My fear is it ends up like “The Road”

    2. I know exactly what you mean! I listened to the same propaganda bullshit here in Australia. They were trying to give the illusion of impartiality but blaming Russia every so often!

  3. In my opinion the US organised both planes to go down. why? Looking at a number of youtube clips shows some woman claiming Flight MH370 was a “demo” for Putin! Who is she? Why did she say what she has? Both Flights have deviated from route with no apparent reason or directive! Obama wants war, the push is coming from above, from the elite. They are pushing ahead with their Agenda! This should sent an ALARMING message to China!

  4. I don’t see this going to war. Well, beyond the current one. Europe won’t even go along with sanctions. The US doesn’t even have the balls to sanction Gazprom, nonetheless put boots on the ground. Putin won’t do anything unless the US does.

  5. The most unbelievable coincidence is that a US spy sattelite was over the region, when this happened. It was over for 15 minutes, yet somehow the disaster happened in the exact same time. How’s this possible, I wonder.

  6. The definition of propaganda based off google is: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.

    The United States have only shown reports of US officials reports and “evidences,” which are all biased and vague. I have read so many reports, but none have mention any basic questions you would ask in an incident like this. Blaming Russia and accusing them of covering up and promoting propaganda is hypocritical base on what the United States did immediately after the tragedy. Without direct evidences and verified confirmation, they put all the blame on Russia. Obama is playing a game of, “Let’s try to turn the rest of the world against Russia.” All hell breaks lose when someone else shoot down a civilian airplane, but when the United States shoots a civilian plane with 290 innocent people on it, it’s fine to do that, right? Regan said he would never apologized on behalf of the US for that incident. You don’t see stories of that on the media. Russia has even produce evidences and questions for Ukraine to answer, but the media ignored that too and keeps mass-manufacturing more false allegations, since it’s the most powerful tool to manipulate most Americans. All of the allegations are based off ridiculous sources that could never verify the truth. Social media was the first. Looting reports are based of a reporter picking up wallets without money in it. Drop your wallet 30k feet from the sky and see if your cash stays in it unless you have one of those kid zipper wallets. Do can’t assume something without determining other variables that plays with this crash. Senior Intelligence Officials insisted that Russia has no direct link to the crash, but quoted ” that Russia created condition for the crash.” That is a psychological way to persuade readers and also create false information in their kinds. The United States knows actually what happened, but will never release hard physical evidences. Instead, they will presumely put out more vague illustrations, and propagandas. The government will cover-up the cover-up of the cover-up if they have to.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Time limit is exhausted. Please reload CAPTCHA.