Tag Archives: recession

Tesla, Gold And Coronavirus – Fraud And Global Depression

To say the current stock market is in a bubble is an insult to the word “bubble.” Tesla experienced an insanely idiotic stock price move after reporting “shock and awe” headline numbers for revenue and EPS which “beat” estimates – estimates that had been lowered by analysts throughout 2019. But as always there’s plenty of dirt in the details which point to a reality that is far different than is represented by headline numbers and Tesla’s highly orchestrated earnings presentation.

There’s just no telling when this Electric Tulip will inevitably crash. But, as with any investment bubble the popping will happen suddenly and unexpectedly, when the bulls are convinced that the upside is limitless and the bears are in a state of terror.

Meanwhile, the physical gold market which underlies the complicated web of paper gold derivatives continues to push the gold price higher despite aggressive efforts by the western Central Bank and bullion bank price management team. In fact, data from the BIS indicates that the BIS had a heavy hand in the effort to cap the price-rise of gold during January using its physical gold swap and leasing transactions.

Paul at Silver Doctors invited me onto its podcast to discuss these issues


You can learn more about  Investment Research Dynamics newsletters by following these links (note: a minimum subscription period beyond the 1st month is not required):  Short Seller’s Journal subscription information   –   Mining Stock Journal subscription information

Everything Is Worse Now Than In 2007

Does anyone seriously believe that in the next global recession equity markets will not collapse? Do market participants really believe fiscal stimulus and helicopter money will save us from a gut-wrenching global bust that will make 2008 look like a picnic? Has the longest US economic cycle in history beguiled investors into soporific complacency? I hope not. – Albert Edwards, Market Strategist at Societe Generale

Friday’s 625 point plunge in the Dow capped off another volatile week. Three of the top 20 largest one-day point declines in the Dow have occurred during this month. Remarkably, the Dow has managed to hold the 200 dma 5 times in August. The SPX similarly has managed to hold an imaginary support line at 2,847, about 40 SPX points above the 200 dma. The Russell 2000 index looks like death warmed-over and it’s obvious that large funds are unloading their exposure to the riskier small-cap stocks.

The randomness of unforeseen events causing sudden market sell-offs is starting to occur with greater frequency. Friday’s sell-off was triggered by disappointment with Jerome Powell’s speech at Jackson Hole followed by an escalation of the trade war between China and Trump. Given the response of the stock market to the day’s news events, I’m certain no one was expecting a less than dovish speech by the Fed Head at J-Hole or the firing of trade war shots.

It’s laughable that the stock market soars and plunges based on whether or not the Fed will cut rates, and by how much, at its next meeting. At this point, only stocks and bonds will respond positively to the anticipation of more artificial Central Bank stimulus. And the positive response by stocks will be brief.

Morgan Stanley published a table of 21 key global and U.S. economic indices – ranging from the Market Global PMI manufacturing index to the Goldman Sachs US financial conditions index – and compared the current index levels to the same indices in September 2007. Every single economic index was worse now than back in late 2007. September 2007 was the first time the Fed cut rates after a cycle of rate hikes.

But there’s a problem just comparing a large sample of economic indices back then and now. By the time the Fed started to take rates down again in 2007, it had hiked the Fed funds rate 425 basis points from 1% to 5.25%. This time, of course, the Fed started at zero and managed to push the Fed funds rate up only 250 basis points to 2.5%. Not only is the economy in worse shape now than at the beginning of the prior financial crisis but the Fed funds rates is less than 50% as high as it was previously.  For me this underscores that fact that everything is worse now than in 2007.

The commentary above is an excerpt from the latest issue of the Short Seller’s Journal. Each issue contains economic and market analysis short sell ideas based on fundamental analysis, including ideas for using puts and calls to express a short view. You can learn more about this newsletter here:  Short Seller’s Journal Information.

Thanks Dave for the TREE recommendation. I covered in the high $200’s for a very profitable trade after it cracked finally – subscriber “Daniel”

Recession Fears Fading? ROFLMAO

The news headlines explained the sudden jump in the S&P futures this morning by stating that “recession fears had faded.”  Just like that. Overnight.  I guess the fact that the housing starts report showed a 9% sequential drop in housing starts last month and and a year-over-year 10% plunge means that the housing market is no longer considered part of the economy.

That report was followed by a highly negative March consumer confidence report which included that largest drop in the “present situation” index since 2008.  What’s stunning about this report is that consumer confidence usually is highly correlated with the directional movement of the S&P 500. Obviously this would have suggested that consumer confidence should be soaring.

I explained to my Short Seller Journal subscribers that, once it became obvious the Fed would eventually have to start cutting rates and resuming QE, the stock market might sell-off. I think that’s what we saw on Friday. The “tell-tale” is the inversion in the Treasury yield curve. It’s now inverted out to 7 years when measured between the 1-yr and 7-yr rate. On Friday early the spread between the 3-month T-Bill and the 10-yr Treasury yield inverted. This has occurred on six occasions over the last 50 years. Each time an “officially declared” recession followed lasting an average of 311 days.

The yield curve inversion is a very powerful signal that economy is in far worse shape than any Fed or Government official is willing to admit. the Treasury yield curve “discounts” economic growth expectations. An upward sloping yield curve is the sign that the bond market expects healthy economic growth and potential price inflation. An inverted curve is just the opposite. If you hear or read any analysis that “it’s different this time,” please ignore it. It’s not different.

The inverted yield curve is broadcasting a recession. For many households, this country has been in a recession since 2008. That’s why debt levels have soared as easy access to credit has enabled 80% of American households to maintain their standard of living. The yield curve is telling us that credit availability will tighten considerably and the recession will hit the rest of us. This is what Friday’s stock market was about, notwithstanding the overtly obvious intervention to keep the S&P 500 above the 2800 level on Monday and today.

Without a doubt, through the “magic” of “seasonal adjustments” imposed on monthly data we might get some statistically generated economic reports which will be construed by the propagandists as showing “green shoots.” Run, run as far away as possible from this analysis. The average household has debt bulging from every orifice. In fact, the entire U.S. economic system is bursting at the seams from an 8-year debt binge. It’s not a question of “if” the economy will collapse, it’s more a matter of “when.”

Key Economic Data Continue To Show A Recession

Goldman Sachs’ net income declined 42% from 2009 to 2016. How many of you reading this were aware of that fact? Yet GS’ stock price closed today 36% above its 2009 year-end closing price. See below for details.

Auto sales in April declined again, with the Big Three domestic OEMs (GM, F and Chrysler) missing Wall St estimates by a country mile. The manipulated SAAR (seasonally adjusted annualize rate) metric put a thin layer of lipstick on the pig by showing a small gain in sales from March to April. But this is statistical sleight of hand. The year over year actuals for April don’t lie: GM -5.7%, F -7% and Chrysler -7.1%. What is unknown is to what extent the numbers reported as “sales” were nothing more than cars being shipped from OEM factory floors to dealer inventory, where it will sit waiting for an end-user to take down a big subprime loan in order to use the car until it gets repossessed.

The growth in loan origination to the key areas of the economy – real estate, general commercial business and the consumer – is plunging. This is due to lack of demand for new loans, not banks tightening credit. If anything, credit is getting “looser,” especially for mortgages. You can discover this if you talk to loan providers large and small (such as this one here: onyxfinance.com.au). Since the Fed’s quantitative easing and near-zero interest rate policy took hold of yields, bank interest income – the spread on loans earned by banks (net interest margin) – has been historically low. Loan origination fees have been one of the primary drivers of bank cash flow and income generation. Those four graphs above show that the loan origination “punch bowl” is becoming empty.

HOWEVER, the Fed’s tiny interest rate hikes are not the culprit. Loan origination growth is dropping like rock off a cliff because consumers largely are “tapped out” of their capacity to assume more debt and, with corporate debt at all-time highs, business demand for loans is falling off quickly. The latter issue is being driven by a lack of new business expansion opportunities caused by a fall-off in consumer spending. If loan origination continues to fall off like this, and it likely will, bank earnings will plunge.

But it gets worse. As the economy falls further into a recession, banks will get hit with a double-whammy. Their interest and lending fee income will decline and, as businesses and consumers increasingly default on their loans, they will be forced to write-down the loans they hold on their balance sheet. 2008 all over again.

Because of this, I think Goldman Sachs (GS) makes a great short idea, although I don’t want to suggest timing strategies. It’s an idea that, in my view, you need to short a little at a time and add to it if the stock moves against you. I could also be a good “crash put” idea.

Goldman will be hit by a fall-off in loan demand and by a big drop in the fees from securitizing the loans it underwrites into asset-backed securities (ABS). In addition, GS facea an even bigger drop in the fees from structuring and selling OTC “hedge” derivatives to the buyers of Goldman-underwritten loans and ABS.

Goldman’s net interest income has declined over the last three years from $4.1 billion in 2014 to $2.6 billion in 2016. This is a 36.5% drop. To give you an idea of the degree to which bank net interest income has dropped since the “great financial crisis,” in its Fiscal Year 2009, Goldman’s net interest income was $7.4 billion. That’s a 64% drop over the time period. In FY 2009, Goldman’s net income was $12.2 billion. In 2016, GS’ net income was $7.1 billion, as 42% decline.

To give you an idea of how overvalued GS stock is right now, consider this: At the end of GS’ FY 2007, 6 months before the “great financial crisis” (i.e. the de facto banking system collapse), Goldman’s p/e ratio was 9.5x. At the end of its FY 2009, its p/e ratio was 6.9x. It’s current p/e ratio 13.5x. And the factors driving Goldman’s business model, other than Federal Reserve and Government support, are declining precipitously.

As for derivatives…On its 2016 10-K, Goldman is showing a “notional” amount of $41 trillion in derivatives in the footnotes to its financials. This represents the sum of the gross long and short derivative contracts for which Goldman has underwritten. Out of this amount, after netting longs, shorts and alleged hedges, Goldman includes the $53 billion in “net” derivatives exposure as part of its “financial instruments” on the asset side of its balance sheet. Goldman’s book value is $86 billion.

If Goldman and its accountants are wrong by just 1% on Goldman’s “net” derivatives exposure, Goldman’s net derivatives exposure would increase to $94 billion – enough to wipe out Goldman’s book value in a downside market accident (like 2008). If Goldman and its “quants” have mis-judged the risk exposure Goldman faces on the $41 trillion in gross notional amount of derivatives to which Goldman is involved by a factor of 10%, which is still below the degree to which GS underestimated its derivatives exposure in 2008, it’s lights out for Goldman and its shareholders.

Think about that for a moment. We saw how wrong hedge accounting was in 2008 when Goldman’s derivative exposure to just AIG was enough to wipe Goldman off the Wall Street map had the Government not bailed out the banks. I would bet any amount of money that Goldman’s internal risk managers and its accountants are off by significantly more than 1%. That 1% doesn’t even account for the “fudge” factor of each individual trading desk hiding positions or misrepresenting the value of hedges – BOTH crimes of which I witnessed personally when I was a bond trader in the 1990’s.

As you can see in the 1-yr daily graph above, GS stock hit an all-time high on March 1st and has dropped 12.5% since then. I marked what appears to be a possible “double top” formation. The graph just looks bearish and it appears Goldman’s stock is headed for its 200 dma (red line,$202 as of Friday). To save space, I didn’t show the RSI or MACD, both of which indicate that GS stock is technically oversold.

The analysis above is from the April 16th issue of IRD’s Short Seller’s Journal. I discussed shorting strategies using the stock plus I suggested a “crash put” play. To find out more about the Short Seller’s Journal, use this link: SSJ Subscription information. There’s no minimum subscription period commitment. Try it for a month and if you don’t think it’s worth it, you can cancel. Subscribers to the SSJ can subscribe to the Mining Stock Journal at half-price.

The U.S. Economy Appears To Be In Trouble

Broad economic activity in the United States contracted sharply in first-quarter 2015.  Underlying activity was so weak that the heavily-gimmicked and bloated reporting of headline U.S. Gross Domestic Product (GDP) activity showed an outright contraction…There is no rebound developing in second-quarter GDP, which should become increasingly evident in the next two months.  Leading-indicator signals from real retail sales and new orders for durable goods, as well as early reporting on industrial production, all are consistent with headline, back-to-back quarterly downturns.  – John Williams, Shadowstats.com

On Friday we found out that the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment poll dropped to 6-month lows during May.  As Bloomberg News describes:  there is month-to-month weakness which doesn’t point to strength for consumer spending in May. The current conditions component ends May at 100.8 vs April’s 107.0 in weakness that also hints at trouble for May’s jobs market. A decline in the expectations component, to 84.2 from 88.8 in April, points to less confidence in the longer-term jobs outlook.

What’s interesting about this sentiment reading is that, historically, there is a strong correlation between consumer sentiment/confidence readings and a rising stock market.  The S&P 500 hit a new all-time last week and yet consumer sentiment is tanking.

In addition, the Chicago PMI (Purchasing Managers Index) crashed to a 6-year low.  The overall level is back to where it was when Lehman collapsed.  New orders, production and employment all contracted in May.  The index has dropped 5 out of the last 7 months, plunging in 3 of the months.  The index measures manufacturing and non-manufacturing activity in the Chicago region, which is considered a manufacturing “bellweather” regaion. The overall index dropped to 46 from April’s 52.3 reading.  53.1 was expected.  A reading below 50 means that manufacturing activity was contracting in May.

I wrote an article for Seeking Alpha in which I presented data which supports the thesis that U.S. economy is in real trouble. This is despite the reputedly “strong” housing market market, which is primarily of a product of Fed-fueled housing price inflation and individual “investor”/flipper activity.   The flippers are about to get stuck holding a big “bag” of extremely overpriced homes.

I believe the data I presented above indicates the likelihood that the U.S. economy is currently in a recession. If not a recession, then it’s headed into one. I believe this economic downturn has a high probability of being worse and last longer than the 2009 recession.

You can read the entire article here:   The U.S. Economy May Be Entering Crash Mode

Economy Crash



The U.S. Economy: “Escape Velocity” To The Downside

Well, now we know why the new Wall Street brain trust consensus for an interest rate hike has been pushed out to September.   Kick that can down the road some more.   These Wall Street idiots really like to move around in herds.  They’re like cattle, or sheep.  Perhaps they even get treated like sheep by their male overlords, or herdsman if you will…

The Bureau of Economic Analysis reported that Q1 GDP came in at a .2% annualized rate of growth.  The underlying numbers are far worse, however.  But first, here’s an example of what downside “escape velocity” looks like (source Zerohedge, edits are mine) – click to enlarge:


The economy is tanking just like I’ve been suggesting in several previous posts.  The change in real private inventories added .74% to Q1 GDP.  This means that manufactures piled up inventory.   BUT, real final sales of domestic product dropped .5% in Q1 (vs. a 2.3% gain, supposedly in Q4 2014).   This means that the .2% GDP number was boosted .74% by manufacturers producing inventory that didn’t sell.  If manufacturers produced goods at the rate those goods were selling, GDP would have been negative.

This is why we get graphs that look like this one, which shows business inventories to sales:


That graph shows a big part of the reason for “downside escape velocity.”   If big manufactures had been applying “just in time” inventory management, GDP would have been negative because real final sales were negative.

Update:  Zerohedge is identifying the inventory build that I just described as “the biggest inventory build in history” (LINK).  What’s going to happen to manufacturing output when retail spending does not recover, despite the good weather?  Let’s call what will happen, “escape velocity to the downside.”

And why are real final sales negative?  This graph goes a long way toward answering that question:


That graph shows the direction of wages for 80% of the population that actually have jobs. 80% of all workers have less money to spend, especially after netting out non-discretionary spending plus the increased cost of Obamacare.  That graph shows real “downside escape velocity” in wages.

Real nonresidential fixed investment dropped 3.4%.  What happened to this boom in commercial real estate?  I know for a fact that the commercial real estate vacancy rate in Denver is soaring.   I’m hearing the same thing from readers all over the country.   QE has done nothing except keep the big banks from collapsing and has created hundreds of billions of dollars of malinvestment, leading to massive overcapacity of commercial buildings and production facilities.

The reason propaganda, manipulated economic statistics and market intervention/rigging always ultimately fails is because eventually the truth about the underlying reality eventually emerges.   This is why I believe that we are on the cusp of a massive systemic collapse.



First Quarter GDP Was Negative: Economy Headed For Deep Recession

It may not seem like it if you have a well-paying job which covers most of your Obamacare costs and that enables  you make  your mortgage payment, pay the leases on your cars and enjoy discretionary spending, but for the 76% of the country that lives paycheck to paycheck the economy never really recovered from the Great Financial Collapse and is getting worse by the day.  See this article, for example:  CNNMoney.

I predicted late last year that the first quarter GDP might register an economic contraction. You would know it from watching just the stock market, but the first revised estimate of Q1 GDP showed a 1% decline occurred.

I wrote an article for Seeking Alpha explaining how the trend in retail sales and home sales – two key variables to the economy – are showing the strong possibility of an even bigger contraction in Q2.  You can read the full article here:   Negative Q1 GDP, Q2 Worse?

By the way, the bond market – which usually “sniffs” out trouble before the stock market sees it – is telling us that my analysis is likely on the right track.   By the  way, Obama’s war-mongering in the eastern hemisphere plus Obamacare spending saved the economy from going even more negative in Q1 (in case you wondering why Obama seems anxious to start wars with everyone)…


One more point, before you fall for the highly-spun propaganda that the Obama Government has narrowed the spending deficit, you should know that funded Treasury debt – i.e. the amount of new Treasury debt issued and the money spent – was $250 billion in Q1 – or $1 trillion annualized.  Debt is only issued to cover deficit spending…

FIrst Quarter GDP Declined 1%


The first revision of Q1 GDP showed  that GDP declined 1%.  If you strip out inflation, the contraction would be even more severe.  The original Government Q1 estimate showed a .1% increase, before inflation is stripped out.   Forecasters were expecting the revision to show a .5% decline.  It came in at -1%.   You can read Forbes’ reporting of this here:   Recession Time.

Of course, in it’s infinite Einsteinian wisdom and superlative willingness to spin the facts, Bloomberg News is reporting that negative GDP number does not mean a recession.  I guess they have their own “special” dictionary of economic definitions.

You tell me, does this look like a recession has set in (source Forbes, edit in red is mine):


Let me correct one mistake in the title of that graph.  It says “real” GDP.  But the number that’s being reported is “nominal” GDP, meaning it includes price inflation.  If you strip out the price deflator used the Government of 1.3%,  “real” GDP would -2.3%.

Bloomberg is also blaming the bad number on “the weather.”  Oh, the dog ate my homework.  But we know that’s not true because the retail sales and housing numbers continue to decline month to month this year through April.  Sorry Bloomberg/media, April had great weather for the most part.  Was it too sunny out to go shopping or look for a home?

The real economy is contracting even more quickly than the rigged Government numbers show.  Retail sales are plunging, with both shopping mall and online sales registering declines.  Real average weekly income is declining, inflation is heating up and more people leave the workforce everyday and take out student loans to enroll at OnlineUniversity.com.

It’s going to get very ugly in our system over the next several months.  If you own gold and silver in your possession, hold on tight and add.  If you don’t own any, may your Higher Power – whatever you call it – have mercy on your soul…